Law Enforcement Bulletin

Sign up for newsletters and other news
Media > Newsletters > Law Enforcement Bulletin > December 2012 > State v. Platt — Twelfth District Court of Appeals (Brown, Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Fayette, Madis

Law Enforcement Bulletin RSS feeds

State v. Platt — Twelfth District Court of Appeals (Brown, Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Fayette, Madison, Preble, and Warren counties), Nov. 13, 2012

12/18/2012
Question: Does a peace officer violate a suspect’s Fifth Amendment right if the officer does not inform the suspect that anything he says will be used against him in a court of law?

Quick Answer: No, as long as the suspect is told the substance of his constitutional rights, there is no need to issue a Miranda warning verbatim.

Facts: When defendant Phillip Platt was arrested, the interrogating detective advised him of his Miranda rights, but he failed to explicitly tell him that any statement he made could be used “against him.” The interrogation was videotaped, and as the detective advised Platt of his Miranda rights, the detective can be heard saying, “This is the Miranda card and this says that I warn you I am a police officer. You have the right to remain silent and anything you say can and will be used in a court of law.” Platt filed a motion to suppress statements he made based on a Miranda violation.

Why this case is important: The court held that the detective’s Miranda warning was constitutionally sufficient. There is no rigid rule that requires the content of the Miranda warnings given be the precise language contained in the Miranda opinion. Here, Platt was informed of the substance of his rights, that any statement he made could be used in a court of law. Platt could have readily inferred that any statement given to the investigators could be used against him.

Keep in mind: It is important that officers give the substance of all the Miranda rights, but failing to use certain “magic words” don’t give defendants a “Get Out of Jail Free Card.”  

Visit the Twelfth District Court of Appeals website to read the entire opinion.